Now that it has been almost two weeks since the LOST series finale, I have had enough time to collect my thoughts on the series and how they ended it. Although I was satisfied with the ending when I first watched it, the more I think about it, the more I hate it. The final, taken by itself, was an excellent episode. Like nearly every episode of LOST, it had great acting, a compelling story, was visually beautiful and left the viewer with a lot to think about. The problem with it (and the entire final season) was that none of the mysteries that drove the LOST series in the first five seasons were answered. Sure, they answered the “flash sideways” but that didn’t even exist until the final season. Looking back now, it feels like the writers were just making things up the entire time with no plan at all. While watching season 2 of LOST, I said to myself that there is no way they were going to be able to explain everything so I was prepared to deal with the fact that not all would be explained. But to explain nothing at all? How lame!
Before the start of the 6th season, I bought the first 5 seasons of LOST on Blu-ray with the plan that I would watch the entire series again. I was assuming that I would be able to watch it with a totally new perspective knowing how it all ends. I would be able to pick up clues, hidden meanings and piece together what was really going on – similar to if you watched Fight Club or the Sixth Sense for a second time. But forget that. While we were led to believe that all the events and people in the first 5 seasons of the show had this deeper meaning and significance to be explained later in the show, it all turned out to be a ruse. It’s like the writers could say “Hey, let’s pretend that Walt is the key to everything in this episode”, then never explain it. I don’t think that every single mystery need to be explained, but at least explain something! Off the top of my head, here are just some of questions I have that were never answered.
- Why does this island have magic powers?
- How come no one can find/get to the island?
- How come babies can’t be born on the island?
- Why does the island allow for time travel?
- How did all of the survivors survive the plan crash?
- How come John Locke wasn’t paralyzed once he came to the island?
- What’s up with Walt? He went from being super important to never seen again?
- Why was Michael (and other whisperers) stuck on the island?
- What happened after the Bomb (maybe?) went off?
- When and how did the island go under water?
- How does the island move?
- Why when you move the island by turning the donkey wheel do you end up in Tunisia?
- How come Hurley, Miles and others can see dead people?
- Why does Desmond have special resistance to electromagnetism?
- How did Jacob have the power to heal people and make Richard live forever?
- How come no one on the island ever came across a huge lighthouse at the top of a hill or the glowing yellow light from the last episode?
- Why did the smoke monster turn into the smoke monster?
- Why could the smoke monster not leave the island, not travel over water and not go through a line or ring of ash?
- Why could the smoke monster take over dead people’s bodies?
- What is the significance of the numbers (i.e. why those numbers)?
- How come no one could kill Man in Black or Jacob, except Ben could kill Jacob?
- What was up with the water that brought Sayid back to life?
I could go on and on… virtually everything that has happened on LOST has had no explanation.
Going into the final season of LOST, with the right ending, I thought that it had a chance to catch the Wire as my favorite TV drama ever. But after realizing that nothing from the previous season was going to add up, I might have to move LOST down a few spots – below Sopranos, Mad Men, The Tudors and Rome. Don’t get me wrong, it was still a great show and well worth watching for all these years. But looking back, I feel cheated and let down that the writers had no plan at all.
For more on Lost, check out these links…
Out of the four major professional sports in the US, the NHL has probably lost the most popularity over the past 20 years. Over-expansion, increased competition by other entertainment sources (TV), and bad decision making by people running the league have contributed to a major decline in hockey’s prominence. Hockey’s problems are many:
- Too many teams
- Teams in the wrong areas/teams with no history
- The season is too long (too many meaningless games)
- Too many breaks in the action
- No rivalries anymore
- Few recognizable stars
- Competing for attention with other sports and during prime TV season
But not all is negative. Hockey has some great things going for it too, as anyone who watched the men’s Olympic hockey can attest:
- Exciting, fast-paced action
- The game is much easier to follow on HD
- Meaningful games can be great (i.e. playoffs, Olympics)
- Fighting (who doesn’t like watching a hockey fight?)
- Better live than on TV
As a very casual fan of hockey, I watch very little NHL, especially during the regular season. But I love Olympic hockey and will watch a decent amount of playoff hockey as well. I could become a huge NHL fan, if only the league did more to cater to potential fans like myself. Below are my ideas of changes that hockey could make to bring in new fans such as myself. I realize that some of these changes would be impossible to implement, but nonetheless, here are my proposed changes to fix the NHL.
Reduce the Number of Teams
30 teams is too many. Instead of six divisions of five teams, the NHL should go with four divisions of six teams for 24 teams total. By reducing the number of teams, we will be improving the quality of talent on the ice for each game as well as getting rid of many of the new teams the NHL has foolishly added over the past 20 years. The NHL has expanded to the southern US and small markets like Columbus and Carolina – into cities with no hockey tradition and little hope of establishing one.
Many of these new teams need to go. To get to 24 teams, we need to get rid of six teams. Since, we would also be bringing back the Quebec Nordiques, this means getting rid of seven teams. Sorry Columbus, Nashville, Atlanta, Phoenix, Carolina, and Anaheim… the NHL will no longer be played in your city. As for Tampa Bay and Florida, I propose a 7-game series at the end of the season to determine which of these teams gets to keep its place in the NHL. (How exciting would that be?!) And Dallas, you are no longer named the Stars, the Minnesota Wild will be once again known as the Minnesota North Stars.
Go Back to Divisional Playoffs
As a kid growing up, I can remember the Bruins playing the Canadiens nearly every year in the playoffs. The fact that every team played their division rivals in the first two round of the playoffs year after year built up tremendous rivalries. This was unique to the NHL but the league abandoned this format when it decided that expanding to cities like Columbus and Nashville was more important than keeping the playoff rivalries in tact. With four divisions of six teams, we will be bringing back the old-style inter-divisional playoff system. Four teams in each division make the playoffs; one team moves on to play the conference’s other division winner for the right to go to the Stanley Cup Finals.
No Commercials Breaks During the Action
How great was the fact that the Olympics had no commercials breaks? Unlike any NHL game, I did not channel surf because there was no time to. I was glued to the action! Get rid of mandatory commercial breaks and TV timeouts and the games flows much better and can more easily captivate the audience. Soccer runs commercial-free for 45-50 minutes during each half and it is the most popular sport in the world. The NHL should plaster sponsors on the front of each team’s jersey just as soccer does to offset the loss of TV commercial revenue. Nowadays with Tivo and DVR, TV viewers can easily fast forward through their favorite shows. Live sports will never have the same capability since most fans are going to prefer to watch games in real-time.
When I say no commercials, I mean no commercials where they typically have them now: after goals, when a penalty is called and at regularly scheduled intervals (TV timeouts). I would actually give each team two (3-minute) timeouts per game in which TV stations could cut for commercials. I believe a couple team timeouts per game would have minimal effect on the flow of the game and would also allow the league to bring in some TV ad revenue. Also, in conjunction with this rule, referees would have to constantly keep the game moving. I find that there is a lot of standing around in between the action in the NHL as opposed to the Olympics. In the Olympics, it seems as though the Refs keep the game moving quicker. The NHL should do this too. NHL games with quick moving refs and (virtually) no commercials could probably end in 2 hours.
Larger Rinks
Everyone seems to love 4-on-4 hockey. The reason? Lots of open ice. Changing the NHL to a 4-on4 game is not only too radical, its unnecessary. Simply increase the size of the rinks by 10-15%. And not just the rink, but the blue lines as well. 10% larger ice area plus 10% larger defensive/attacking zone will produce a product that is open similar to the 4-on4 game. The NHL has done a good job the past few years in enacting rule changes to open up the game and increase scoring (2 line pass rule change, crack down on holding, reduce the size of goalie pads). A larger rink would just be another step in the right direction.
Spring to Fall Season
Currently, the NHL plays its season from October to April. This is the absolute worst time period for the season to take place. It begins the season competing head to head with the NFL, college football, NBA, and college basketball. During the season it competes for viewers with all these sports plus it is also prime TV season, with most shows running from the fall to the spring. There is huge opportunity in my opinion during the summer for another sport to step up. Right now, baseball is the only major sport that plays during the summer and I believe that is one of the reasons why baseball is very popular. Baseball is boring as hell, but Americans love sports and it’s all they have during the summer. Plus, prime time TV shows usually are off during this season so someone like myself is more likely to watch a hockey game if there is nothing else good on TV. There would be no more breaks in the season for the Olympics either. Oh, and finally, I would much rather go sit in a cold hockey arena in the Summer to cool off than during a freezing, cold winter day… but that might just be me.
Get Rid of Shootouts, Bring Back Ties, 10 Minute OT & Simplify Scoring
Shootouts are a ridiculous way to determine the winner of a hockey game. There is nothing wrong with a tie… two teams play for 60 minutes plus a short overtime and if they are still tied, then just call it a tie. The NHL should keep overtime sudden death and 4-on-4 , but increase the length to ten minutes. And the complicated scoring system has got to go. Here is how I would do it: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a tie, 0 points for a loss. Simple and fair. The three points would hopefully encourage teams to go for the win rather than settling for a tie.
Shorten Season, Add Tournaments
82 games is way too many games for the NHL regular season. Take a look at what happened in the Eastern Conference playoffs this year: the #8 seed beat the #1 seed, #7 beat #2, #6 beat #3. The Conference Finals was played between the #7 seed and the #8 seed! What’s the point of the regular season? Obviously it doesn’t count for much. The problem of the regular season in the NHL (you can add the NBA and MLB as well) is that there are way too many meaningless games. The genius of the NFL and professional soccer leagues is that every game matters. This is hardly the case in the NHL. Another issue that I have is that the only goal a hockey team can have is to win the Stanley Cup. What if there were other trophies teams could earn each year? We can solve both of these issues by reducing the season to 50 games and adding tournaments. The NHL playoffs, the Olympics, the Beanpot… who doesn’t love tournament hockey? Here are some ideas for tournaments that could take place during the NHL season:
- Knockout Style “Madness” Tournament – This could be played right after the All-Star game as the regular season takes a week or two off. All 24 teams play with the top 8 teams (based on league record) getting a bye for the first round. This plays out like the NCAA basketball tournament: single game elimination with teams playing every other day. They could play this whole tournament in a week and a half and it would be awesome. Also, I would play the entire tournament in the same city (using 2 rinks at the most).
- Rivalry Tournaments – These could be similar to the Beanpot in that the same teams could be invited to play every year. Each tournament could have 4-8 teams and use its own format. For example, how about a round-robin tournament for the original 6 teams? Or how about a tournament for all of the Canadian teams? Each of these small tournament could use their own rules… some could be round-robin with the top two teams playing to determine the winner, others could play a knockout tournament using the aggregate scoring from 2 games (home and away for each team), etc. Each of these tournaments would have its own trophy, similar to how college football teams play for Victory Bells and Paul Bunyan trophies. Every team would play in only one of these tournament and it would be the same one year after year. Also, I would play the tournaments out during the season with tournament games interspersed throughout the regular season (similar to league cup tournaments in European soccer).
- Consolation Playoffs – The 8 teams that don’t make the playoffs play a knockout tournament with teams playing short, best-of-three series. The winner of the tournament could get an extra draft pick (say the 9th pick in the draft) and the 2 teams who play in the finals would get an invite to the…
- Preseason Invitational – Right before the regular season starts, I would have 8 teams come and play a tournament to kick off the regular season. I would invite the final 4 teams from the previous NHL playoffs, the final 2 from the consolation playoffs, winner of the previous season’s knockout tourney and the winner of the previous season’s Preseason Invitational. We could fill-in these invites with tournament runner-ups or the top teams by regular season points if one team qualified more than once. While other teams are still going through pre-season, these 8 teams would play in New York (the media capital!) to start the season.
These are just some ideas for tournaments. There are almost limitless ways to have tournaments and nearly all would be more exciting and generate more interest than virtually meaningless regular season games.
Bring Back Pee Wee One-on-One During Period Intermissions
When I was younger, I used to watch a ton of Bruins games and possibly my favorite part was Pee Wee One-on-One that they would do between the first and second period. Pee Wee One-on-One was basically a shootout between local youth teams (probably kids that were 8-12 years old). I think this would still be fascinating today for me to watch as an adult, but I am sure that kids would love it. And what better demographic for the NHL to market to than kids? The other major American sports seem to have done a much better job of this than the NHL. Hockey has seemingly missed a generation of kids over the past 20 years and this might be one small step in reaching out to the next generation.
In some more ridiculous news, according to Salon.com, at least two US Senators have never used an ATM. In the words of Senator Ben Nelson (D-Neb):
“I’ve never used an ATM, so I don’t know what the fees are. It’s true, I don’t know how to use one. But I could learn how to do it just like I’ve … I swipe to get my own gas, buy groceries. I know about the holograms.”
Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) not only has never used an ATM, but admits “that he doesn’t even know the basic principle behind them”. Senator Mike Johanns (R-Neb) has used an ATM less that 5 times in his life – and he is a member of the Senate Banking Committee! Oh man… are these rich, old fucks out of touch with ordinary people or what?
Here are reviews of some books I have read (or, at least, started reading) over the past year or so…
The Greatest Show on Earth (Richard Dawkins) – ♦♦♦ 3 stars
Makes a persuasive case for evolution, but gets a bit repetitive. In some sections, this book presents complicated material in a simplified manner that I could understand while other sections were over my head.
American Conspiracies (Dick Russell & Jesse Ventura) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
A ton of thought-provoking material here on conspiracies starting with the assassination of Lincoln through the cause of the financial meltdown. The one drawback is it is tough to separate factual information from the speculative.
The Selfish Gene: 30th Anniversary Edition (Richard Dawkins) – ♦♦♦♦♦ 5 stars
I can’t give this book enough stars. The Selfish Gene is a clear, easy-to-understand explanation of evolution that explains virtually everything about how life has developed and thrived on Earth. Probably one of the most important books on science, this should be required reading for everyone.
The Odds (Chad Millman) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
I read this book for the second time recently before my trip to Las Vegas for the NCAA Tournament. The Odds is a fascinating look into the life of those who gamble on sports for a living told through three perspectives: the college dropout just moved to Vegas to gamble, the 20-year gambling veteran, and the bookmakers for a large Vegas casino.
Sustainable Energy – Without the Hot Air (David J.C. Mackey) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
This book tackles the world’s coming energy problem using a plethora of stats and figures. Unlike most books on energy, Sustainable Energy looks at the viability of energy solution mathematically determining what could plausibly fill our energy needs in the future. Includes a ton of excellent information, though will all its charts and graphs, it would have been easier for me to digest in a physical book rather than the Kindle’s digital version.
Why Your World is About to Get a Whole Lot Smaller (Jeff Rubin) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
This book is an economists look at oil, energy and the world economy, arguing that the high price of oil was the reason for the financial meltdown and the driving force that will shape our economy in the years to come. This is probably the most fair and objective analysis of the coming energy crisis that I have come across.
Soccernomics (Stefan Szymanski) – ♦♦♦ 3 stars
This book starts off great and includes a lot of interesting facts pertaining to world soccer. Unfortunately, I found some of the arguments not very convincing as I would have interpreted the data much differently – virtually opposite in fact. I would say that some of the chapters in this book are 5-star worthy while others are closer to 1-star caliber.
Last Words (George Carlin) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
I found this autobiography of George Carlin a great read. Carlin was a fascinating man and this book tells the story of his life from early childhood until his recent death. If you are a Carlin fan and don’t know about his personal life, this book is a must read.
Value of Nothing (Raj Patel) – ♦♦ 2 stars
This book makes some good points regarding the true economic cost of the stuff we buy -including long-term environmental costs. But I found the overall anti-capitalist theme to be much too idealistic and out of touch with reality. While the “free market” system has some problems, I don’t see the solutions in this book being very plausible.
Stones Into Schools (Greg Mortenson) – ♦♦♦ 3 stars
Mortenson is a true inspiration who does amazing work, dedicating his life to building schools in the most desolate places on Earth. This book chronicles his story and for a while it was a captivating read. I must admit that I got bored with it after a while as the minutia was just too much for me and I quit reading before I was finished.
Eating the Dinosaur (Chuck Klosterman) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
This collection of essays from Chuck Klosterman features more hits than misses. While not his best work, I found most of the essays an interesting read at the very least. As only he can, Klosterman seems as though he is trying too hard to prove how intelligent he is yet still comes off as interesting and likable. This book is a quick read full of original thoughts on topics including but not limited to: ABBA, Ralph Sampson, what it’s like to be a wolf, the idiocy and lasting impact of laugh tracks, and Pepsi’s marketing strategy.
Every Hand Revealed (Gus Hansen) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
A unique poker book that takes the reader through an entire poker tournament through the mind of an unorthodox player. I found this book provided great insight into the actual decisions made on each and every hand of a championship-level tournament.
The Lost Symbol (Dan Brown) – ♦♦ 2 stars
This book actually starts out interesting, but the suspension of belief the reader needs to take is just too much. This book should have ended hundreds of pages before as the ending (which I never even got to) is just ridiculous, even for a Dan Brown novel. I felt bad after reading this, feeling as though I had just wasted many hours of my life.
The Given Day (Dennis Lehane) – ♦ 1 star
I have enjoyed many Dennis Lehane books, but this one just didn’t do it for me. Set in the early 20th century, The Given Day is basically about baseball and racism. To me, it felt contrived and overly sappy/politically correct. I did not make it very far with this one.
Free (Chris Anderson) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
This book makes a compelling case that many traditional companies are going to have to adapt their business models to a new price point – Free! Those that embrace this have the potential to thrive while old, rigid businesses who fight this will die. This book makes a compelling case and is a must read for anyone who works in or is interested in the future of marketing, online business and/or the transfer of data/ideas.
$20 Per Gallon (Christoper Steiner) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
I found this to be an entertaining (and very ambitious) take on how our society would change if and when gas goes up to $20 per gallon. Each chapter is labeled Chapter $6, Chapter $8, Chapter $10, etc. all the way up to Chapter $20. The book takes the outlook that people will not change until they are forced to – and with astronomical oil prices they will be forced too. I especially liked the section about smart electricity grids – don’t know how close that would be too reality, but interesting nonetheless!
The Post-American World (Fareed Zakaria) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
I found this too be a good read, not so much about the fall of America, but the rise of new world powers – China, India, Russia, Brazil (BRIC). Although I think Zakaria underestimates the tough problems these emerging economies are going to face, his general premise of a new world order without one dominant superpower is probably an inevitability. I found this book to be optimistic and fairly unbiased.
Street Fighters (Kate Kelly) – ♦♦♦♦ 4 stars
This insiders look at the last 72 hours of Bear Stearns paints a clear picture of the culture that has persisted on Wall Street for years, and ultimately helped to cause the current financial crisis. Its amazing to think that a company with the history of Bear Stearns could go from seemingly worth billions on Friday to virtually worthless on Monday, but thats pretty much the story told here.
Columbine (Dave Cullen) – ♦♦♦♦♦ 5 stars
This book was a fascinating look at the Columbine massacre and the 2 boys behind it. Dave Cullen does an excellent job researching and presenting everything there is to know about what happened at Columbine. Also features a shocking look into the psychology of the sociopath who planned and carried out the massacre.
|
|
